Impending liberalisation of foreign investment in the retail sector in India
08 September 2011
Impending liberalisation of foreign investment in the retail
sector in India
Retailers who wish to expand their brand internationally
sometimes decide to hold shares in the local master franchisee or
developer company. So far in India it has not been possible for
foreign parties to have any shareholding in a company in India
which is involved in multi-brand product retail.
Direct foreign investment so far has only been permitted in
relation to “single brand” operations, where up to 51% of the
shares can be held by the foreign brand owner. It is also possible
for foreign companies to own up to 100% of the shares of a company
involved in wholesale trading in India (even
multi-brand) and there are successful examples of western brands
who are doing so, such as Wal-Mart, Metro and Carrefour.
For years international companies have lobbied for
liberalisation of the regulations restricting multi-brand retail
operations but have met with massive resistance from local
retailers and traders who feel threatened by the entry of foreign
retailers. However the uncontrollable rise in food prices in India
due to inefficiencies, wastage, lack of infrastructure and storage
facilities has made the Indian Government seriously think about
allowing foreign retailers in, on the basis that they also
contribute significantly to the overall development of the retail
sector and ensure lower prices for customers. However, still
concerned about the role of small business in preserving the fabric
of the country, the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion
(DIPP) has recommended that such foreign retailers should be
restricted to large cities with over a million population including
capital cities of various states within India.
The “Committee of Secretaries” (the expert panel responding to
the Government) has ,according to media reports, approved a
proposal to allow 51% foreign direct investment in multi-brand
retail but subject to some stringent conditions:
- investment must be at least US $100 million which will rule out
all but the very largest;
- 50% of the investment must be channelled into building back-end
infrastructure such as warehouses, cold storage facilities and more
efficient supply chains; and
- 30% of supplies to the new retail business must be sourced from
the micro, small and medium sized enterprises (MSME) sector in
India.
The proposal is also reported to have had the backing of the
Reserve Bank of India as it believes that foreign investment in the
retail sector will reduce soaring inflation.
The current status of the proposal is that it still requires
Cabinet approval. As regular readers of our updates on India will
know this subject has a very long history and given the
controversial nature of the issue and the lobbying interests
involved on all sides there may well be further developments before
anything is finalised. Furthermore, the Government of India has not
formally released any official notification about the Committee of
Secretaries’ proposal.
As will be seen from the conditions attached to it, this
proposal is not of much relevance other than to the world’s very
largest retailers, as it is aimed principally at large supermarket
chains whom it is felt could help alleviate the immediate problems
with the high cost of food in India and contribute to efficient
supply chain development in the country. If the Cabinet
approves the idea of liberalisation of the multi-brand sector in
this way, it is perhaps conceivable that the Government might later
consider adopting a similar approach for other types of retailers,
for example in the furniture or clothing sectors.
Of course it would always be open to “single brands” to approach
the new supermarkets, as several Western brands are already doing
within the largest Indian store groups, to develop ‘shop-in-shop’
arrangements, or other ways of offering their products inside them;
quite apart from their freedom under the existing rules to enter
into franchise arrangements on an arm’s-length basis, or take up to
a 51% stake in such a local operator.
Please feel free to get in touch with Chris
Wormald on any of the above issues.