Primary Market Bulletin No2: consolidation of UKLA guidance
28 September 2012
One of the challenges of interpreting the public company regulatory
framework is the array of sources from which guidance may be
available. Searching for guidance on a particular point can seem
like searching for a needle in a haystack. The withdrawal of the
facility to make no names calls to the UK Listing Authority
("
UKLA") is likely to compound the problem (see
our separate article
here).
The UKLA had already decided to address this panoply of guidance
sources by consolidating its previous guidance into the very useful
set of technical and procedural notes that were published on 15
October 2010. In Primary Market Bulletin No.2, the UKLA has further
developed this approach by setting out the proposed launch of what
it calls the “UKLA Knowledge
Base”.
Structure of the UKLA Knowledge
Base
The UKLA Knowledge Base will serve as a single
repository of the guidance available from the UKLA with regard to
the Listing Rules and other rules under Part 6 of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000. The UKLA Knowledge Base will also
include explanations of how certain issues are expected to be
addressed, as well as any information deemed as useful to market
practitioners.
As part of the development of the UKLA
Knowledge Base, all previous notes issued by the UKLA have been
reviewed. The notes which are still considered to be valid have
been reproduced in the new format; and those considered to be
outdated have been withdrawn or revised. 72 notes have been
reformatted. Unfortunately, there is a lot of information missing
form the new reformatted notes that is presumably still valid
guidance.
Within the new format, the notes are all given
a unique reference number. This reference number is split into four
parts. All the unique reference numbers begin with UKLA, and this
is followed by either PN (Procedural Note) or TN (Technical Note).
The third element of the unique reference number refers to the
topic of the note, and the final number determines the version of
the note.
A full list of the notes which have been
amended into the new format can be found at:
www.fsa.gov.uk/library/policy/guidance_consultations/2012/ukla-bulletin.
Given the very large number of notes that were
being issued for consultation simultaneously, the UKLA provided
little time to submit a response. Comments were requested by 14
August 2012, although this was subsequently extended to 24 August
2012.
Overview of Newly Proposed
Notes
Along with the reformatting of previous notes,
the UKLA also introduced 11 new notes, of which 3 are Procedural
Notes and 8 are Technical Notes.
Block listing, UKLA/PN/907.1
A block listing is a facility which allows an
issuer to admit to listing unallotted securities, which are to be
issued over an extended period of time. The note explains the
rationale for the block listing regime. It states that in order to
ensure the block listing regime is consistent with the Financial
Services Authority's ("FSA") statutory duty to
admit securities only when it is satisfied that relevant regulatory
requirements are satisfied, its availability is limited. It is most
commonly implemented in connection with the issue of shares under
employee share option schemes and as a result of conversion of
convertible instruments and the exercise of warrants. Within the
note, the UKLA highlights practical requirements for applications
under the block listing regime, including the importance of full
disclosure in the application for a block listing.
The UKLA is not prescriptive about the
circumstances in which a block listing regime will be available.
However, the regime would not be available for issuances that are
likely to have very few allotments, for the avoidance of fees or
for the purpose of carrying out placings of shares.
UKLA decision making and review process,
UKLA/PN/908.1
This note covers the decision making procedure
of the UKLA, including its internal escalation process. Escalation
can be triggered either by the UKLA personnel dealing with a matter
themselves or the individual seeking guidance under SUP 9.5.1G. The
note sets out a seven step general description of the decision
making process. The possibility of an appeal is also covered by the
note, including information about the structure of the Listing
Advisory Review Committee and the appeal process. However, the note
does not cover referrals of UKLA decisions to the Upper
Tribunal.
Sponsor firms - ongoing requirements
during reorganisations, UKLA/PN/909.1
Understandably, given the current economic
climate, there has recently been an increase in the number of
sponsor firms that have been the subject of some form of
reorganisation, including a change of control. It is noted that
during any transitional period caused by a reorganisation, a
sponsor has an ongoing requirement to meet the criteria for the
role, as set out in LR8.6.6R.
The note also reminds readers that the sponsor
firm should be in contact with the Sponsor Supervision Team from
the early stages of a proposed reorganisation, even though other
parts of the FSA may also be notified as a result of a potential
change of control. The note sets out a list of information that the
UKLA will require at the time of such a reorganisation in order to
assess ongoing competence to perform sponsor services.
Approval of circulars,
UKLA/TN/206.1
This note seeks to remind issuers with a
Premium Listing that, unless an exemption applies, a circular must
not be published without the prior approval of the FSA. Exemptions
apply, amongst other things, where resolutions are being circulated
that are not unusual. It is for an issuer and its advisers to
ascertain whether or not a resolution is unusual. However, just
because a resolution is an ordinary resolution does not mean that
it is not unusual. Circulars that relate to meetings requisitioned
by shareholders should normally be considered to be unusual. The
UKLA should be consulted quickly in such situations because the
company has a finite time to convene the meeting under company
law.
Long term incentive schemes,
UKLA/TN/208.1
This note relates to a long term incentive
scheme set up to facilitate the retention or recruitment of an
individual director under LR 9.4.2R(2). The rule states that this
facility is available only in “unusual circumstances”, since it
circumvents the normal requirement for a shareholder vote in
respect of such matters. The note states that the UKLA would expect
the rule to be rarely used in practice. The note is unhelpfully
short on specific guidance on the meaning of "unusual
circumstances".
Related party transactions - Modified
requirements for smaller related party transactions,
UKLA/TN/308.1
Related party transactions normally require a
financial adviser's fairness opinion to be published in connection
with the transaction, as well as a shareholder vote. However, there
is an exemption for smaller related party transactions. In such
circumstances, LR.11.1.10R(2)(b) requires, amongst other things,
that a written confirmation from an independent adviser be provided
to the FSA stating that the proposal is fair and reasonable so far
as all shareholders of the issuer are concerned. This note
addresses the recent use of language in such letters which limits
the use of the letter by the FSA as well as the inclusion of third
party disclaimers. The FSA considers it "unnecessary" to include
such provisions in the letters. The note also states that
explanations for the opinion are unacceptable since they could
qualify the validity of the opinion. A clean confirmation tracking
the wording of the rule itself should be given.
Related party transactions - Issuer's
undertaking, UKLA/TN/309.1
Also in the context of a smaller related party
transaction, the issuer is obliged to include certain details in
respect of the transaction in its next published annual accounts.
This note provides guidelines from the UKLA in relation to the
preparation and content of such disclosure. This note is produced
in response to numerous accounts of a lack of clarity found in
previous cases. These guidelines are provided as a method to
improve standards, and so are advised to be followed. If the
standards do not improve, the FSA has stated that it may choose to
take disciplinary action.
Prospectus disclosures on credit rating
agencies, UKLA/TN/631.1
This note is produced as a result of the
introduction of The Credit Rating Agency Regulation 1060/2009. This
Regulation requires that any reference to a credit rating in a
prospectus must come with a statement determining whether it is
from a credit rating agency that is established in the EU and
registered under the Regulation. The note goes on to provide
examples of what will be required by the disclosure. A key point to
pick up on in the note is the requirement to disclose the name of
the specific legal entity that has been registered or certified, as
opposed to the global trading name of the organisation
concerned.
Sponsor's obligations on financial
position and prospects procedures, UKLA/TN/708.1
In connection with a main market IPO, under LR
8.4.2R(4) a sponsor declaration is required to the effect that
"the directors of the applicant have established procedures
which provide a reasonable basis for them to make proper judgments
on an ongoing basis as to the financial position and prospects of
the applicant and its group". The note goes on to state that
"established" means that all necessary procedures have been put in
place at the point of admission, even though they may not have been
operated at that point.
The note also states that the sponsor should
make due and careful enquiry; the UKLA would expect to see evidence
of the sponsor's own enquiries, challenges and actions at all
stages of its engagement, notwithstanding the possible role of the
reporting accountants.
Reliance by a sponsor on a comfort letter from
a reporting accountant, without evidence of an appropriate level of
sponsor enquiry and challenge, will mean the sponsor has not met
its obligations under LR 8.4.2R(4).
Equality of treatment - Listing Principle
5, UKLA/TN/207.1
Listing Principle 5 states that all
shareholders of the same class should be treated equally in terms
of the rights attached to the shares unless holders are considered
to be in a different position. The note identifies that there are
few circumstances in which the UKLA will accept that a certain
group of shareholders can be treated differently. The note states
that the UKLA is of the view that a capital reorganisation by means
of a share consolidation and subsequent share split, with the aim
of removing small shareholders, would be a breach of this
principle.
Sponsor transactions - Adequacy of
resourcing, UKLA/TN/709.1
Under LR8.6.6R, a sponsor will be required at
all times to demonstrate that it is competent to carry out all
sponsor services in connection with a particular transaction. The
note sets out some of the factors that should be considered when a
sponsor determines whether or not it is competent to provide
sponsor services in connection with a transaction. The onus is on
sponsor firms to assess their ability to act each time they are
considering an appointment. However, it goes on to note that the
Sponsor Supervision Team monitors the transactions to which
sponsors are appointed and will be prepared to take action to
require firms to review their ability to act on transactions where
the risks to the integrity of the sponsor regime are high. Sponsors
should be aware of a potentially "intrusive approach by the
UKLA".
Amerjit
Kalirai is a Partner in the Corporate Group of Field Fisher
Waterhouse LLP in London.