Skip to content .

Competition Update - January 2007

22 January 2007

European Commission's second highest overall cartel fine
The European Commission has recently imposed a fine of €519 million on companies involved in a synthetic rubber cartel. This is the Commission's second highest overall cartel fine. One of the companies got 100% immunity (and saved €204 million) by blowing the whistle on the cartel.

Action taken for breaking a seal during a dawn raid
The European Commission has recently accused E.ON Energie AG of breaking a seal during a dawn raid conducted in May 2006. If the Commission concludes that its allegations are correct, it can impose a fine of up to 1% of the total group turnover of E.ON Energie in the preceding business year.

New Commission guidelines on immunity from fines
The European Commission has taken another step to encourage companies to come forward with information on cartels with the coming into force of the Commission's new leniency notice on 8th December 2006. The Commission's leniency regime offers full immunity against, or a reduction in, a fine which would otherwise be imposed on a cartel member in return for either blowing the whistle or coming forward with key information.

The most important developments brought about by this new notice, which replaces that of 2002, are:

  • the provision of helpful clarifications on the information which a company needs to provide in order to obtain full immunity against, or a reduction in, a fine;
  • the introduction of a "marker" system under which a company applying for full immunity can guarantee its place in the queue of informants by providing limited information on the cartel with more detailed information to follow at a later stage; and
  • protection of information provided by companies in so-called "corporate statements" from disclosure to third parties such as complainants in damages proceedings.

New Commission guidelines on setting fines for breaches of EC competition law
On the 1st September 2006 new Commission guidelines on the method for setting fines for breaches of Article 81 (which prohibits anti-competitive agreements) and Article 82 (which prohibits the abuse of a dominant position) entered into force. Neelie Kroes, the EC Competition Commissioner, said "The three main changes - the new entry fee, the link between the fine and the duration of the infringement, and the increase for repeat offenders - send three clear signals to companies. Don't break the anti-trust rules; if you do, stop it as quickly as possible, and once you've stopped don't do it again... If companies do not pay attention to these signals, they will pay a very high price." (Commission Press Release IP/06/857).

Scrutiny of joint venture interests in merger control analyses
The Office of Fair Trading ("OFT") has, for the first time, identified competition law concerns in a merger which would result in the two main competitors in a local area becoming parties to a joint venture. The OFT's concern was that the involvement of these two main competitors in the joint venture would result in the coordination of their activities.

GSK Spain - parallel trade in pharmaceuticals
A partial victory for the pharma industry as the European Court of First Instance overturns a Commission decision condemning GSK Spain's "dual-pricing" system for pharmaceuticals. The Court found that the Commission should have taken greater account of the special features of the pharmaceutical industry in deciding whether or not restrictions on parallel trade were justified. The case has now returned to the Commission for reconsideration.

Contacts

Charles Whiddington

Search all publications by type


Related expertise